Lutheran Theological Review

Following Mark’s link to the pistis christou article from Lutheran Theological Review (both at at the Brock University site (which also includes an index file) and the Concordia Lutheran Theological Seminary site, here are the other relevant articles from the free online archive of that journal which could be argued to fall within the area of New Testament studies:

1. Paul

John R. Wilch, “Romans 11:15: did God reject the Jews?” Lutheran Theological Review 2, no. 1 (1989): 9-14.

Thomas M. Winger, “Rhetoric and media in the judgement of St Paul.” Lutheran Theological Review 16 (2004): 47-58.

2. Galatians

Roger J. Humann, “James 2 and the background to Galatians.” Lutheran Theological Review 2, no. 2 (1990): 22-34.

3, James

Roger J. Humann, “James 2 and the background to Galatians.” Lutheran Theological Review 2, no. 2 (1990): 22-34.

4. Hebrews

Paul Williams, “The eucharist in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Lutheran Theological Review 12 (2000): 97-105.

5. Mark

Jayson S. Galler, “Matthew 12:30; Mark 9:40; Luke 9:50; 11:23: ‘with and for’ or ‘against’?” Lutheran Theological Review 14 (2002): 10-26.

6. Matthew

Jayson S. Galler, “Matthew 12:30; Mark 9:40; Luke 9:50; 11:23: ‘with and for’ or ‘against’?” Lutheran Theological Review 14 (2002): 10-26.

7. Luke-Acts

Jayson S. Galler, “Matthew 12:30; Mark 9:40; Luke 9:50; 11:23: ‘with and for’ or ‘against’?” Lutheran Theological Review 14 (2002): 10-26.

8. John

Roger J. Humann, “The function and form of the explicit Old Testament quotations in the Gospel of John.” Lutheran Theological Review 1, no. 1 (1989): 31-54.

9. Historical Jesus

Vernon R. Raaflaub, “The apocalyptic ‘Son of Man’: background to the New Testament use of the term: a preliminary study concentrating on Daniel and 1 Enoch.” Lutheran Theological Review 7, no. 1-2 (1995): 91-106.

John R. Wilch, “Why was it necessary for the Pharisees to oppose Jesus?” Lutheran Theological Review 1.1 (1983): 20-36.

Additions: James

James

J. Severino Croatto, La fe que llega a su teléiosis o perfección: Santiago 2,22b (retórica, estructura literaria y teología de Santiago 2,14-26). Revista Biblica 62.1-2 (2000) 101-119.

Wilhelm Bousset and Wilhelm Heitmüller (eds), Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments: neu übersetzt und für die Gegenwart erklärt: Dritter Band: Die Apostelgeschichte, der Hebräerbrief, und die katholischen Briefe. 3., verb. und verm. Aufl. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1917).

M. Johann Daniel Schulze, 1802. Der schriftstellerische Charakter und Werth des Petrus, Judas, und Jakobus, zum Verhuf der Specialhermeneutik ihrer Schriften untersucht und bestimmt. (Weißenfels: Böse, 1802).

Additions to James

I have added a few items to the James page:

Books

Fenton John Anthony Hort, The Epistle of St. James: The Greek Text with Introduction, Commentary as Far as Chapter IV, Verse 7, and Additional Notes. (London: Macmillan & Co., 1909). http://www.ccel.org/ccel/hort/james1909.html

Max Lackmann, Sola Fide: Eine Exegetische Studie Über Jakobus 2 Zur Reformatorischen Rechtfertigunslehre. (Beiträge Zur Förderung Christlicher Theologie Reihe 2, 50.) (Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1949). http://www.archive.org/details/MN41946ucmf_4

William Patrick, James, the Lord’s Brother. (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1906). http://www.archive.org/details/jamesthelordsbro00patruoft

A. T. Robertson, Practical and Social Aspects of Christianity: The Wisdom of James. (New York: Hodder and Stoughton, 1915). http://www.archive.org/details/practicalsociala00robe

James Hardy Ropes, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle of St. James. (International Critical Commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments.) (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1916). http://www.archive.org/details/criticalandexege028105mbp

Adolf Schlatter, Die Briefe Des Petrus, Judas, Jakobus, Der Brief an Die Hebräer: Ausgelegt Für Bibelleser. (Erläuterungen Zum Neuen Testament 9.) (Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1953). http://bitflow.dyndns.org/german/AdolfSchlatter

Articles

M. J. Evans, “The Law in James”. Vox Evangelica 13.(1983): 29-40. http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/vox/vol13/james_evans.pdf

Timothy George, “‘A Right Strawy Epistle’: Reformation Perspectives on James”. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 4.3 (2000): 20-31. http://www.sbts.edu/resources/publications/sbjt/2000Fall.php

Ron Julian, “A Perfect Work: Trials and Sanctification in the Book of James”. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 4.3 (2000): 40-51. http://www.sbts.edu/resources/publications/sbjt/2000Fall.php

Sophie Laws, “Introduction”. In. A Commentary on the Epistle of James. (London: Black; San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1980). pp 1-42. http://www.hendrickson.com/pdf/intros/1565630173-intro.pdf

Sophie Laws, “[James 1:1-8]“. In. A Commentary on the Epistle of James. (London: Black; San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1980). pp 45-61. http://www.hendrickson.com/pdf/chapters/1565630173-ch01.pdf

Dan G. McCartney, “The Wisdom of James the Just”. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 4.3 (2000): 52-65. http://www.sbts.edu/resources/publications/sbjt/2000Fall.php

Edgar V. McKnight & Christopher Lee Church, “Introduction to James”. In. Hebrews-James. (Macon: Smyth & Helwys, 2004). pp 323-332. http://www.helwys.com/commentary/art_010903/pdfs/heb-james_sample.pdf

Edgar V. McKnight & Christopher Lee Church, “Struggles of the Faithful: James 1:1-27″. In. Hebrews-James. (Macon: Smyth & Helwys, 2004). pp 333-353. http://www.helwys.com/commentary/art_010903/pdfs/heb-james_sample.pdf

Todd C. Penner, “The Epistle of James in Current Research”. Currents in Research: Biblical Studies 7.(1999): 257-308. http://artemis.austincollege.edu/acad/rel/JamesinCurrentResearch.pdf

George Reyes, “The Wage’s Cry: A Literary and Sociological Reading of James”. Journal of Latin American Hermeneutics 2.(2005). http://www.isedet.edu.ar/jolah/thewagecr.pdf

Vernon K. Robbins, “A Comparison of Mishnah Gittin 1:1-2:2 and James 2:1-13 from a Perspective of Greco-Roman Rhetorical Elaboration”. In: Jack N. Lightstone (ed). Mishnah and the Social Formation of the Early Rabbinic Guild: A Socio-Rhetorical Approach. (Waterloo: Wilfried Laurier University Press, 2002). pp 201-216. http://www.emory.edu/COLLEGE/RELIGION/faculty/robbins/Pdfs/Lightstone.pdf

Mark A. Seifrid, “The Waiting Church and Its Duty: James 5:13-18″. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 4.3 (2000): 32-39. http://www.sbts.edu/resources/publications/sbjt/2000Fall.php

Robert H. Stein, “‘Saved by Faith [Alone]‘ in Paul Versus ‘Not Saved by Faith Alone’ in James”. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 4.3 (2000): 4-19. http://www.sbts.edu/resources/journal-of-theology/sbjt-43-fall-2000/saved-by-faith-alone-in-paul-versus-not-saved-by-faith-alone-in-james/

Huub Van de Sandt, “James 4,1-4 in the Light of the Jewish Two Ways Tradition 3,1-6″. Biblica 1.38-63 (2007). http://www.bsw.org/?l=71881&a=Comm03pdf.html