Reviews

Dale C. Allison, The Jesus Tradition in Q (Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 1997) in Review of Biblical Literature (1998). Review by Edward P. Meadors.

Andreas Ennulat, Die “Minor Agreements”: Untersuchungen zu einer offenen Frage des synoptischen Problems (WUNT 2/62; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1994) in Critical Review of Books in Religion 9 (1996). Review by David L Dungan.

Mark Goodacre, Goulder and the Gospels: An Examination of a New Paradigm (JSNTSup, 133; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996) in Review of Biblical Literature (1998); also in JBL 117 (1998), pp. 742-4. Review by Robert Gundry.

Allan J. McNicol, “Has Goulder Sunk Q?: An Assessment of Mark Goodacre’s Goulder and the Gospels: An Examination of a New Paradigm”, paper read to the Synoptic Problem Seminar at SNTS Birmingham, August 1997, now reproduced on The Two Gospel Hypothesis Home Page. It is available as an HTML document (previous link) or a PDF file, for which you will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Paul Hoffmann, Tradition und Situation: Studien zur Jesusüberlieferung in der Logienquelle und den synoptischen Evangelien (NTAbh n.F. 28.; Münster: Aschendorff, 1995) in Critical Review of Books in Religion 9 (1996). Review by John S. Kloppenborg.

Alan Kirk, The Composition of the Sayings Source: Genre, Synchrony and Wisdom Redaction in Q (NovTSup, 91. Leiden: Brill, 1998) in Review of Biblical Literature (2000). Review by Arland Jacobson.

Kim Paffenroth, The Story of Jesus According to L (JSNTSup, 147; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997) in Review of Biblical Literature (1998), also in JBL 118 (1999), pp. 363-4. Review by Mark Goodacre.

Edward P. Meadors, Jesus the Messianic Herald of Salvation (WUNT 2/72. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1995) in Review of Biblical Literature (1996). Review by Stephen Patterson.

Allan J. McNicol, Jesus’ Directions for the Future: A Source and Redaction-History Study of the Use of the Eschatological Traditions in Paul and in the Synoptic Accounts of Jesus’ Last Eschatological Discourse (New Gospel Studies 9; Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1996) in SBL Review of Biblical Literature (1998). Review by Michael Luper.

Allan J. McNicol, David L. Dungan, and David B. Peabody (eds.), Beyond the Q Impasse – Luke’s Use of Matthew: A Demonstration by the Research Team of the International Institute for Gospel Studies, (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1996) in Review of Biblical Literature (1998). Review by Christopher Tuckett.

Allan J. McNicol, David L. Dungan, and David B. Peabody (eds.), Beyond the Q Impasse – Luke’s Use of Matthew: A Demonstration by the Research Team of the International Institute for Gospel Studies, (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1996) in Toronto School of Theology Journal 14/1 (1998). Review by Robert Derrenbacker, reproduced on the Synoptic-L web site.

A Response to Robert A. Derrenbacker, Jr. by William R. Farmer, published on the Two Gospel Hypothesis Site.

Christopher Tuckett, Q and the History of Early Christianity: Studies on Q (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1996) in Review of Biblical Literature (1998), also in JBL 117 (1998), pp. 744-6. Review by Stephen Patterson.

Werner Zager, Gottesherrschaft und Endgericht in der Verkündigung Jesu: Eine Untersuchung zur markinischen Jesusüberlieferung einschliesslich der Q-Parallelen (BZNW 82; Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 1996) in Review of Biblical Literature (1998). Review by John T. Carroll.

Don’t miss out

Get the latest NTGateway news, content, and more—sign up today!