Following Mark’s link to the pistis christou article from Lutheran Theological Review (both at at the Brock University site (which also includes an index file) and the Concordia Lutheran Theological Seminary site, here are the other relevant articles from the free online archive of that journal which could be argued to fall within the area of New Testament studies:

1. Paul

John R. Wilch, “Romans 11:15: did God reject the Jews?” Lutheran Theological Review 2, no. 1 (1989): 9-14.

Thomas M. Winger, “Rhetoric and media in the judgement of St Paul.” Lutheran Theological Review 16 (2004): 47-58.

2. Galatians

Roger J. Humann, “James 2 and the background to Galatians.” Lutheran Theological Review 2, no. 2 (1990): 22-34.

3, James

Roger J. Humann, “James 2 and the background to Galatians.” Lutheran Theological Review 2, no. 2 (1990): 22-34.

4. Hebrews

Paul Williams, “The eucharist in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Lutheran Theological Review 12 (2000): 97-105.

5. Mark

Jayson S. Galler, “Matthew 12:30; Mark 9:40; Luke 9:50; 11:23: ‘with and for’ or ‘against’?” Lutheran Theological Review 14 (2002): 10-26.

6. Matthew

Jayson S. Galler, “Matthew 12:30; Mark 9:40; Luke 9:50; 11:23: ‘with and for’ or ‘against’?” Lutheran Theological Review 14 (2002): 10-26.

7. Luke-Acts

Jayson S. Galler, “Matthew 12:30; Mark 9:40; Luke 9:50; 11:23: ‘with and for’ or ‘against’?” Lutheran Theological Review 14 (2002): 10-26.

8. John

Roger J. Humann, “The function and form of the explicit Old Testament quotations in the Gospel of John.” Lutheran Theological Review 1, no. 1 (1989): 31-54.

9. Historical Jesus

Vernon R. Raaflaub, “The apocalyptic ‘Son of Man’: background to the New Testament use of the term: a preliminary study concentrating on Daniel and 1 Enoch.” Lutheran Theological Review 7, no. 1-2 (1995): 91-106.

John R. Wilch, “Why was it necessary for the Pharisees to oppose Jesus?” Lutheran Theological Review 1.1 (1983): 20-36.